Quooker vs. water cooler in the office: which is more economical?

Lees dit artikel op de Crowntap blog over Quooker kokend-waterkranen in België.

← Back to blog

Related pages

Attention facility managers: the Quooker beats the water cooler on almost every front. The figures prove it.

The business water comparison

As a facility manager, you're faced with a choice: the traditional water cooler (with bottles or mains connection) or a Quooker with CUBE. Which is more economical? We'll crunch the numbers.

Cost comparison over 5 years (office of 20 people)

Cost itemWater cooler (bottle)Water cooler (mains)Quooker + CUBE
Purchase/installation€0€500€2,595 + installation
Monthly rental€45 = €2,700€35 = €2,100€0
Bottles/filters€1,200€300€600 (CO₂ + filter)
Separate kettle€150€150€0 (included)
Maintenance€500€500€150
Total 5 years€4,550€3,550€3,345 + installation

Over 5 years, the Quooker is several hundred euros cheaper than a bottled water cooler, even including installation. Compared with a mains-connected cooler it costs a little more, but you also get boiling and sparkling water.

Functionality compared

FunctionWater cooler bottleWater cooler mainsQuooker + CUBE
Cold water✅✅✅
Boiling water❌❌✅
Hot water❌❌✅ (COMBI+)
Sparkling water❌❌✅
Chilled water✅✅✅
Separate kettle needed✅✅❌

Sustainability

AspectWater cooler bottleQuooker + CUBE
Plastic bottles/year240
Plastic bottles/year00
CO₂ transportation of bottlesHighNone
Energy consumptionMediumLow
Sustainability score⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

The verdict

The Quooker wins on:

The water cooler wins on:

Discover all business advantages or request a quote for your office.

More on Crowntap